The parable of the Mexican fisherman was hanging in my office for years. Do you remember it?
Recently, I decided to take it down because I believe it serves to reinforce a fallacy many people have about work-life balance, suggesting we cannot have both a successful career and life satisfaction. (That's hooey.) I have observed hundreds who have provided ample evidence that you can have both, provided (and this is a big provision) you stay in control of your career.
Before I continue, I should first share The Parable of the Mexican Fisherman:
The Parable of The Mexican Fisherman
A boat docked in a tiny Mexican village. An American tourist complimented the Mexican fisherman on the quality of his fish and asked how long it took him to catch them.
"Not very long," answered the Mexican.
"But then, why didn't you stay out longer and catch more?" asked the American.
The Mexican explained that his small catch was sufficient to meet his needs and those of his family.

The American asked, "But what do you do with the rest of your time?"
"I sleep late, fish a little, play with my children, and take a siesta with my wife. In the evenings, I go into the village to see my friends, have a few drinks, play the guitar, and sing a few songs ... I have a full life."
The American interrupted, "I have an MBA from Harvard and I can help you! You should start by fishing longer every day. You can then sell the extra fish you catch. With the extra revenue, you can buy a bigger boat.
"And after that?" asked the Mexican.
With the extra money the larger boat will bring, you can buy a second one and a third one and so on until you have an entire fleet of trawlers. Instead of selling your fish to a middle man, you can then negotiate directly with the processing plants and maybe even open your own plant. You can then leave this little village and move to Mexico City, Los Angeles, or even New York City! From there you can direct your huge new enterprise."
"How long would that take?" asked the Mexican.
"Twenty, perhaps 25 years," replied the American.
"And after that?" the Mexican asked.
"Afterward? That's when it gets really interesting," answered the American, laughing. "When your business gets really big, you can start selling stocks and make millions!"
"Millions? Really? And after that?"
"After that you'll be able to retire, live in a tiny village near the coast, sleep late, play with your children, catch a few fish, take a siesta with your wife and spend your evenings drinking and enjoying your friends."
It is a sweet story if the only take-away message is to enjoy the things you have in your life and savor the present. I love this part of the message, it is the subtext that bothers me. Don’t you get the image of a boring middle-aged weenie in wing tips and a serene, sun-kissed fisherman? Aren’t these the stereotypical images of either end of the erroneous and imaginary work-life balance continuum?
Let’s get real.
Everyone defines career success differently: financial freedom, professional security, a thriving business ventures, opportunity for creative expression, all of the above. What is your definition of career success?
If you stay in control of your career destiny, your will have ample time for your spouse, friends, family, faith, sports, hobbies, weekly mahjong game, or whatever else you want your life to include. Honestly, it can be done.
Many of the people who are profiled in Get a Life, Not a Job have wonderful careers and -- more relevant for this post – tremendously happy lives. They have work life work-life balance (or work-life harmony, as I prefer to call it) because they have crafted the type of careers they want in the context of the lives they want to live. From the parable, they have the drive and ambitions of the business person with the life priorities and values of the Mexican fisherman. They compromise on neither.
A recent survey from CareerBuilder found that 1 in 5 people were planning to leave their jobs within the year. This is a very high number in such a tight labor market, suggesting (as the study found) that people want more from their careers and their lives.
The part of the parable that still resonates with me is that life is far too short to spend time in a job you hate and your happiness does not need to be deferred for your golden years. This week I challenge you to visualize the life you want to live that includes your career.
Wishing you work-life harmony,
© 2010, PaulaCaligiuri.com | Website designed by Mary Pomerantz Advertising
Finding a career you love and having someone compensate you for it is a difficult task. Finding a career that blends well with your homelife is even more difficult.
Maslow's Need Theory says that there are 5 different sets of needs that we have. Physiological needs, security needs, love, esteem and self actualization.
For us to provide for our family we need to fulfill the basic physiological needs such as food, water and sleep. Security means finding a secure environment without financial means to provide for our family we won't survive. I think that there is a fine balance of finding a job that you like and that pays you and doing what you love and not being able to survive.
Work Life harmony can be a grind but make the best of it, find your motivation and you will find a perfect balance.
A parable is designed to show us an enlightened path, but is not to be taken literally. The Mexican Fisherman's Parable is about contentment with having enough and remembering what's important. It isn't telling everyone to quit their jobs and become bums. It isn't telling everyone to eschew money and ambition (though they are both potently dangerous without the correct perspective) to both the individual and the planet.
Career success to me is finding that one thing that is your passion, and then finding someone to pay you for it. Right now I am a submariner in the United States Navy, and to me, it's a job. My chief does the same job essentially with some more responsibility, but to him, it's a career. The man made chief(E-7) in seven years, and more then likely will stay in the Navy for thirty years. When we are at sea, he barely sleeps. He lives in the radio room(we are radiomen). When we are not at sea he is always the first to the office, and the last to leave. He has found his career. That is what I am looking for. I want to find that job, that later in my life, they will have to force me to retire, because I do not do it willingly.
Staying in control of my career destiny and having time for my wife and daughter is a hard task to complete. Being in the Navy I am away from my family at least 6 months out of the year. When I'm home, I pick up college courses and I'm close to finishing up my bachelors degree. I also need to help my wife out with raising our daughter, and taking care of our home. It's a hard life, but us sailors learn how to make the most of the little amount of time that we have with our families. We also know how to have that balance. Work-Life Harmony can be a grind, but in my opinion, it is what you make it.
I enjoyed reading the entire blog and of course all of the comments that followed. For the past year, my job title has been "full-time student." I decided to take a year off to finish my Bachelors in Psychology and I am excited to say that in August I will have reached my goal. The reason I mentioned my education was to reference back to the comments. I have been searching for work for a little over six months and I understand, of course, that an education is important. Fulfilling one's life goals and ambitions is definitely good for an individual but I can definitely relate to the fisherman because I have worked at several jobs that I was satisfied with, both financially and with my work relationships. My schedule also allowed me time with my family and I probably would have been satisfied working there until retirement but after the birth of my daughter, for whatever reason, I knew I was definitely capable of much more and wanted to be just like the American that had the MBA from Harvard. I do believe that one is capable of having work-life harmony and I would like to believe that most of us sacrifice the time away from our families for the end result of being able to be around them more often in the near future. Well at least that is my plan and I say near future because I would not like to work now and play later like the American mentioned and wait 20 to 25 years to share moments with my family and friends. I also liked how you defined what you meant between harmony and balance. Your blog was definitely easy to follow and understand. I definitely look forward to picking up a copy of your book!
Im just wondering if the parable of the mexican fisherman comes from the bible?
Life might be too short to stay in a job I hate, but it's also too short to blow my savings and gamble with my stability by quitting. You make it sound like it's just so easy to get a better or more fulfilling job or to "take control" of your career. Guess that might be true if you went to law/med school or have an MBA or PhD or are a computer expert of some type.
I appreciate you taking on the Mexican fisherman fallacy; the businessman's millions offer him far more stability and life opportunities than the fisherman's day-to-day existence -- what happens when the fisherman is too old to fish? But I think you've replaced one fallacy with another: the fallacy that it's possible for Joe Schmo to balance "career success" with personal fulfillment. Joe Schmo is looking at a situation, especially in this economy, where "career success" means "a good job where I'd better show up every day and do what my bosses tell me", not one where he has a lot of opportunity to "take control" of his "career destiny." For Joe, the personal fulfillment will have to wait until he clocks out for the day, otherwise he loses his house and car and endangers his family.
Hi Stutz -
I sincerely appreciate that you took the time to offer this feedback. My desire to be pithy may have obscured what I really mean by "taking control of your career destiny". I do not advocate a "risk it all strategy" in managing one's career. (In fact, I have a book coming out in April with this exact theme.) That said, the single employer full-time job is more risky than many assume; 60% of the currently unemployed had no advanced warning that they were to lose their jobs. Individuals don't own their jobs, their companies do. Companies allocate their human resources. Individuals do, however, own their careers -- and that they can control those.
Please keep reading and commenting.
Paula
I suppose my point is that there's just not a lot of wiggle room for Joe Schmo, so to risk anything at all is to risk nearly everything: his job. The fact that employers treat people as "human resources" instead of persons, and the fact that the single-employer full-time job can be so precarious, as you point out, is exactly the problem for Joe. But I think a lot of such people don't see that there is any other option. A lot of people, even upper-middle class folks, still live paycheck-to-paycheck, and even if they diversified their income they would still be risking financial ruin if they were to lose a significant portion of their total income. I guess I'll have to check out your book in April to see what other options you suggest! But still, without a certain level of education or expertise, what is Joe to do? I personally have a college degree, but because it's in the liberal arts instead of computer science, I'm in the same boat as many of my co-workers who have no degree, as far as job options go. My wife and I have been smart enough to save quite a bit of money, but if one of us were to lose our job, it would be hard to keep our home.
Blogger was cordial in her response, but I'd like to state more directly that Stutz's comments are simply an excuse to live in a state of bitter and resentful negativity. Designing a fulfilling lifestyle and working to take control of your career and your life are just as applicable to Joe Schmo as a multimillionaire, perhaps more. You do not need fancy degrees or lots of cash to do it. It doesn't mean you walk out on your job tomorrow or make any number of idiotic decisions - it means you work to create options for yourself and, yes, everyone has options. What is Joe to do? Depends on his circumstances but some possibilities may include: defining what success would actually be for him and what actually brings fulfillment and excitement to his life; further his education or work on a degree if he thinks that will help get him where he wants to go (I've found it often doesn't); get involved in his community where he may meet some people that can provide different opportunities; diversify his income with some side work or side business that he enjoys; increase productivity at work so his performance improves while also freeing up more time; change jobs (yeah, the economy, yeah, a liberal arts degree, and yeah, all sorts of people are still starting new jobs every day); adjust his lifestyle so he's not living as tightly paycheck-to-paycheck -- downgrade the house or apartment, eat out less, maybe he doesn't need a 50 inch TV, maybe a used Elantra provides just as good of transportation as a new Accord, run outside instead of paying for a gym membership, maybe life exists without an iphone, and any other expense that doesn't create fulfillment but just tries to keep up with the Joneses.
Nothing justifies spending a life in a job you hate. Everyone has options and everyone can take more control of their lives and careers. But it does require taking action and eliminating the infinite excuses as to why you can't do it.
I think we are in almost complete agreement. Our point of departure is that I believe that there are more options within reach of most (not all). As we both know, these are sobering times for folks, unemployed, underemployed, or anxious (as you described well). I value your insight and appreciate your candor, Stutz. It would be a sincere honor for me to hear your feedback on my book.
I think there is this fallacy that when we speak of work life balance that we have to be in balance all the time. I see my career and family commitments as more of a pendulum, where I swing back and forth between the two. When I am at work, I cannot be a super Mom. When I work from home, my focus has to on work or on my children, otherwise I am not good to anyone. The key for me is in knowing when to swing back to one side from the other. But balanced - I never feel balanced. Still, I have a very satisfying career and a very happy family life.
Thank you very much for this comment! I could not agree more. The reason I like the term "work-life harmony" more than "work-life balance" is because balance (in my opinion) conjures up the image of multiple roles receiving the same attention concurrently. Impossible. "Harmony" allows for multiple roles to co-exist in a way you find satisfying overall.
I appreciate your comment.
Post new comment - - It may take upto 24 hours for your comment to appear